I (Astoundingly) made magic with my art at the point of the angel's clouds painted on.  I swear that the angels danced mid-air.  It was rigor art as technical the whole way of painting from drawing - slow going and took only one month after work and nights - every other.  Mond Crucifixion amazed me at the furthest hills near the horizon - it is true that there is not a line.  It is a line as hill meets sky, but, not a straight line from point as connect to point - it is a terrain... (faded iridescent paint of the composition's land into the white looking sky - no real boundary as I know that was U2's point with No Line on the Horizon.  The far hills are iridescent, the clouds for the angels and the upper clouds finished, it looks like th eoriginal masterpiece art work to me.  That is what I mean - that the painting was laborious until these awesome additional criteria of the final phases as painting applications which made it a real masterpiece of my own.  Without the final clouds and horizon, this art was dying.  Now, it is complete.   I love it.  It is very vivid for reproduction art as truly like the original and that is what I needed to do to make it succeed for me.  Every detail adds into the composition.  It is true that I nearly leave out in art - if there were not the clouds around the sun and moon (nearly as not applied onto canvas), it would not be as great.  I am stressing that point too - completing it made it right.  It is besides the composition meaning.  It is a true masterpiece to me and that is success. 

 

It is awkward I say, but, very important for why details need to be in.  Likely that the blood of his hands and rib area are important.  But, that is my say as for another time.  This way, as the pose by Jesus Christ on cross is much more - somewhat wholesome as not a bloody depiction of what was really there. 

 

That is also why I said about dynamics in all kinds of ways for art.  It is about making it art work for me - convincing my viewers about the composition.

 

In other words, the details are most important and selecting what details are more important is a part of reproduction.  Art is not always perfect - I left the blood of Chirst out and Jerome's clothing - both matters in composition as unpainted - it looks convincingly real to me.  It is why art is the most impressive way to elude and doing an illusion well is the prestigous magic...

 

Other parts which are not in this art composition are the signature of Raphael as 'Raphael painted this art' in Latin words.  But, I am not a jerk - I do not take famous artists as myself.   I want it unsigned as a way to make the art as mine.  I do this a lot - not signing, because, it is more for the art as seeing the art for an art work's sake (appreciating art work - looking at it and what may come for anything from inspired, enraged, entranced - anything)...